June / July 1999 |
Swaffham Prior PCC Cllr Robinson said the proposal to build five houses at the top of Cage Hill may not start until 2000. Millennium Committee Cllr Aves reported that a fund had been
set up with Cllr Harrison as Treasurer. A meeting had
decided on a celebration mug and a grant was being sought
to publish a book about the village and also to purchase
a seat for St Etheldreda's Church garden. The making of a
basket for a beacon was also discussed. Matters Arising A meeting had taken place with Cllrs
Fitch, Davies and Aves and residents of The Hythe to
discuss the problem of the damaged verges caused Correspondence Clerk had received letter from the lighting dept. at County. Chris Sproston, the Chief Engineer, is to meet with Cambridge Landscape Architects to discuss replacing a light damaged by a lorry. The owners of the lorry are willing for their insurance company to pay the sum incurred in the repair. Jane Dow, the trees and landscape officer at ECDC, had written asked if de-icing salt could be removed from verges as it kills the grass. Reach Matters It had been reported that a large amount of garden rubbish had been dumped in Barston Drove. The Rights of Way Officer has been informed and he is to send a report to ECDC who hopefully will clear it up. A directional sign for Reach Fen in Great Lane had been reported as having a rotten post. Highways have removed it and are unwilling to replace it as it is considered irrelevant. Steven Hill from Highways has been to 11 Chapel Lane following complaints about tree planting at the front of the house causing possible future obstruction to the highway. The owner is to remove some of the trees. A planning application had been received from the same address. PC decided to object stating that this would be an over development of the site as the plot is very small and could not support two cars and a property. As The Hythe is already having problems it is thought more cars and another access could exacerbate the problem. It was also thought the plan was inaccurate as it showed the property reaching the highway at both front and back which is not the case. |
|
Next Page | Main Menu | Contents | Previous Page |